Who It's For
Are these reports useful for investment screening?
Commodity Production Costs reports are designed for investment screening — they provide the capital and operating cost data needed to evaluate whether a manufacturing investment is economically viable before committing resources.
The reports deliver the inputs that investment decisions depend on:
- CAPEX estimates — Total plant capital cost, owner's cost, working capital, and additional capital in every edition. Detailed breakdowns (ISBL, OSBL, contingency) are available in Detailed and Premium editions.
- OPEX breakdowns — Raw materials costs, utilities, labor, fixed costs, and return on capital employed (ROCE), with full cost detail in Detailed and Premium editions.
- Technology comparison — Multiple production routes per commodity allow comparison of different manufacturing processes before selecting one for further development.
- Cross-location analysis — The Premium edition's companion report add-on provides production costs for an alternative plant location, enabling direct country-to-country comparisons.
Corporate strategy teams, financial analysts, and business development managers use these reports to screen investment options, compare production technologies, and build the financial models that support capital allocation decisions.
Can engineers use these reports for cost modeling?
Cost engineers and investment analysts are among the primary users of these reports. The data supports financial modeling at multiple levels of depth, with the edition chosen matching the granularity required:
- Compact edition — Provides cost summaries (total CAPEX, total OPEX, ROCE) and a production costs datasheet suitable for preliminary estimates.
- Detailed edition — Adds detailed CAPEX breakdowns (ISBL, OSBL, contingency, working capital) and OPEX details (materials pricing, utilities costs, fixed cost breakdown) for more granular modeling.
- Premium edition — Adds plant capacity assessment (costs at different plant sizes), process flow diagrams, equipment lists, and project implementation schedules for the most detailed engineering estimates.
All editions include raw materials and utilities consumption data, labor requirements, and process descriptions that feed directly into cost estimation workflows.
Are these reports suitable for feasibility studies?
Assessing economic feasibility is an explicit use case for Commodity Production Costs reports. The reports deliver Class 4 budgetary estimates — a recognized accuracy class used in pre-feasibility and feasibility evaluations — built on a consistent methodology applied across all 858 reports in the library.
A feasibility study typically requires capital cost estimates, operating cost projections, and process description — all of which are included in every report edition. The Detailed and Premium editions add the granular cost breakdowns (ISBL/OSBL, utilities details, fixed cost details) that more rigorous feasibility analyses require. The Premium edition further supports studies that need plant capacity scaling analysis or process flow diagrams.
Because the methodology is standardized across all reports and refreshed with current data before delivery, the cost inputs remain consistent and comparable across different studies in the same portfolio.
The preliminary design in the reports is intended for cost estimation purposes and should not be used as an actual process design.
Can R&D teams use these reports for process analysis?
R&D engineers and researchers use Commodity Production Costs reports to benchmark the economics of new and emerging processes against established commercial technologies. The reports support R&D work across several dimensions:
- Process comparison — Multiple production routes per commodity enable side-by-side economic comparison between conventional and innovative manufacturing processes, helping teams assess whether an emerging technology can compete commercially.
- Techno-economic assessment (TEA) — Up-to-date CAPEX and OPEX data provide credible inputs for techno-economic studies, including those submitted as part of grant applications or project justification documents.
- Process understanding — Detailed process descriptions, schematic diagrams, and block flow diagrams (in all editions), and process flow diagrams with equipment lists (Premium edition) help researchers understand manufacturing steps and identify areas for improvement.
- Bespoke analysis — For emerging technologies not yet represented in the standard library, bespoke reports can be commissioned with a scope and plant location tailored to specific R&D needs.
Can procurement teams use production cost data?
Procurement and supply chain professionals use Commodity Production Costs reports to strengthen their negotiation position and inform sourcing strategy. The reports provide visibility into the cost structure behind supplier quotes rather than relying solely on observed market prices:
- Clean-sheet cost models — Transparent OPEX breakdowns covering raw materials, utilities, labor, and fixed costs allow procurement teams to build clean-sheet models that reveal what a product should reasonably cost to manufacture.
- Regional sourcing analysis — Standardized CAPEX and OPEX data across different production contexts help identify which sourcing regions offer the most competitive cost environments.
- Technology comparison — Comparable cost structures across different production technologies support informed evaluation of alternative sourcing options, including assessing whether a supplier's chosen process is cost-competitive.
These capabilities let procurement teams negotiate with quantitative knowledge of underlying production economics rather than reacting solely to quoted prices.
How do strategy teams use production cost reports?
Corporate strategy and planning teams use Commodity Production Costs reports for investment screening and competitive analysis. The data addresses the core strategic questions that drive capital allocation and market entry decisions:
- Technology evaluation — Detailed CAPEX and OPEX data for different production routes help determine which technologies are most economically viable for a given commodity, supporting decisions about where to invest or expand.
- Location screening — Cross-country cost comparisons identify which regions offer the most competitive cost environments for new manufacturing investments.
- Consistent benchmarking — The standardized methodology across all reports enables reliable comparisons between processes, locations, and time periods, making it possible to track how competitive dynamics shift over time.
Strategy professionals often combine production cost data with commodity price data (from Primary Commodity Prices) and manufacturing competitiveness indicators (from Industry Economics Worldwide) to build comprehensive investment cases that cover both input costs and market pricing.
Are these reports used in academic research?
Academic researchers and research institutions use Commodity Production Costs reports as a source of independent, standardized techno-economic data. The R&D Engineers & Researchers persona explicitly includes researchers working in public and private R&D centers and universities, and Government, NGOs & Academia is a recognized company segment served by these reports.
Common academic use cases include techno-economic assessments of emerging production technologies, comparative economic studies across manufacturing processes, and cost-basis inputs for grant proposals and peer-reviewed publications. The standardized methodology and consistent structure across all 858 reports in the library make them well-suited for comparative research that requires consistent data across different technologies or regions.
Bespoke reports can also be commissioned for processes or plant configurations not yet available in the standard library, with scope defined to match specific research requirements.
Academic and nonprofit libraries are not eligible to purchase reports under the license terms. Individual researchers affiliated with an institution can purchase reports through the standard B2B checkout process using an institutional business email.